keithrankin.com/clip/1999902HeraldAucklandTransportKR.html


Better roads network should have priority

Neither a new bridge nor an emphasis on public transport will cure Auckland's traffic problems, writes KEITH RANKIN.

Dialogue page, NZ Herald, 2 September 1999
 

Like 100,000 other Aucklanders, I got caught up in Thursday's traffic chaos. I was also caught by the Mangere Bridge closure last December; when I had to take an overseas visitor to catch her plane.

Auckland's transport problems are complex and can be solved by neither a new bridge nor a policy based solely on public transport.

As Auckland grows, we have to get the roading network right and we have to re emphasise the central business district as the heart of the Queen City. Public transport will work in Auckland next century when Auckland becomes a proper city and not just a network of suburban shopping centres.

We need to build the eastern-corridor motorway to protect our equity in the Port of Auckland and to get the big trucks out of the city and the residential roads in the eastern suburbs.

Indeed, with the planned expansion of Auckland Hospital there will have to be a new eastern bypass to prevent traffic chaos in Grafton. We need our roads to be safe, especially in the hospital precincts.

The Ports of Auckland are in head-to-head competition with the Port of Tauranga, which has set up a "land port" in South Auckland. If Infrastructure Auckland paid cash dividends to all Aucklanders as their share of profits from the port, then we might value the port more and show more concern about the port losing market share to Tauranga.

There is another reason Tauranga should not be allowed to encroach too much on Auckland's port business. The road from Auckland to Tauranga is one of the country's most notorious for fatalities and congestion.

Diverting the big trucks from Grafton and Ellerslie to Maramarua and the Karangahake Gorge will create a major nightmare on State Highway 2.

The harbour bridge is not itself a bottleneck. The major bottlenecks to the north and west of the city are south of Victoria Park, and where Takapuna traffic joins the Northern Motorway.

The solution is to make better use of existing infrastructure to the west, including the Upper Harbour Bridge and the new Patiki Rd interchange with the northwestern motorway. That means completing the southwestern motorway to Avondale, linking it with Ash and Rata Sts and Rosebank Rd.

We don't want this western traffic coming back through a tunnel to a second harbour bridge, requiring a new spaghetti junction at Northcote. Rather, a completed southwest motorway would direct bypass traffic to the Upper Harbour inter change at [via] Hobsonville or, if going to Wellsford or points north, to the improved Kaipara Harbour highway.

The deficiencies in Auckland's road network lead vast quantities of traffic that is neither going to or from the CBD to use the central city road system. For a major city, an unusually small proportion of journeys begin or end in the CBD. Aucklanders avoid public transport be cause so many journeys are cross-town or through-town, requiring at least two rides.

If there is one thing worse than being in a car stuck in Spaghetti Junction, it is being in a bus stuck in Khyber Pass.

Auckland evolved as a conglomerate of suburban centres in part because it lacked an integrated transport system. Now Auckland needs the Britomart Centre to break that pattern of growth.

It needs a transport interchange centre near the ferry terminal. Equally, it needs the new commercial developments to revitalise a part of the CBD that has been in decay for a decade. The completion of the electricity tunnel and the Britomart

Centre will enable Auckland's centre to grow faster than its periphery next century.

As the city grows towards a population of two million, which it will do, it is essential that most of the additional journeys be to or from the CBD. It is the growth of the CBD that will provide Auckland with the critical mass needed to run a proper public transport system.

I see the Auckland of 2020 as having a city centre that runs the length of both Queen and Customs Sts. It will have a fully functional "metro" that will include light and heavy rail (surface and under ground), a variety of bus and ferry services and ticketing similar to that of Australia's or Europe's main cities.

In Adelaide, a city with which I am familiar, a single ticket is valid for two hours. If you transfer from a bus to a train or a tram as you journey to work, you continue to use the same ticket. A short return trip to the Adelaide CBD requires only a single ticket.

Auckland needs frequent services to minimise transfer delays, a ticketing sys tem like Adelaide's and public transport that runs to schedule. Buses that are part of the gridlock problem will not suffice.

The Britomart Centre can stimulate both the supply of public transport that Auckland needs and the demand for it. And the completion of the motorway network can remove much of the cross-town and port traffic that clogs Auckland's arteries.
 

Keith Rankin, an Auckland economist, lectures at Unitec and Massey University, Albany.
 


Author's note:

The headline and sub-header given by the Herald are misleading. I do emphasise public transport, while noting that the completion of the roading network will help to create the conditions in which public transport can work for Auckland. See the unabridged version: Solving Auckland's Transport Woes.

back to Herald article